Today your poem arrived in the mail and I am struck by the rich imagery. I am greedy. I want to read more. Yes, I do think it’s good, and yes, it deserves publishing. Problem with longpoems is finding a home—but home is easier to want than to have. (To twist a line of yours). Perhaps a chapbook.
I only have a few moments before I go to the Post Office to mail this.... Also in the mail today, a letter from Partners of the Americas looking for a coordinator—to take on the artist exchange for SF/Mexico City. Fractaline structure. If only they’d called me three months ago.
I feel so committed to the Soviet exchange that it’s hard to even consider revisiting Mexico again. I said I’d think about it, come Sept. It, too is a part-time job... so it’s possible, but crazy-making... so what else is new? My CAC grant is also a part time job, but part time in the non-profit (prophet?) sector means 80-hour weeks as it is.
Oshit! I figured out last night that I’m leaving for the Soviet Union in ONE WEEK so mail those books pronto if I’m to get them on time—verdad? I can’t even count time at present... burnout.
More stuff arrived today for me to courier over to Russia including material from a Leningrad contact who wants to do a traveling whale show... Bizarre grassroots structures and crabgrass. This be gettin’ out of hand, mon!
Anyway, what can I say to you as I prepare to escape to the other side of the world—that I’m in love with your writing? Did our tongues really find truth and/or faith for a moment under a full April Fool's moon? And I am glad that it happened. Sorry for the form it took. And you living in exile in the Big Apple.
Back in October, I was determined you would remember me when you kept forgetting who I was (I know, yet another sleasy poet introduction) but I was not prepared for the form that it took.
How do you spell trouble? Apparently it's: Maureen. So sorry. My girlfriend who warned me off you got it all wrong. It wasn’t you who was Trouble! It was me. How odd for a good Catholic girl to find herself on the other side of the love triangle equation for once. Like the song: I've looked at love from both sides now...
Ah well, I only hope there’s no residual negative Pavlovian response left. Sometimes, late at night, I hear it in your voice. I appreciate when we’re done with all the adrenaline talk, burning up the telephone lines at 3 AM—when you tell me I don’t have to wear the mask. Then, small fragments of the secret emerges (who I really am) and I feel so vulnerable.
I shall always think of you in the sauna’d summer of New York City. screaming obscenities at air conditioners at three AM. I fantasize about meeting you in front of St. Basil’s in Red Square in late August, when the white nights begin to wane, and the ordinary rhythm of light and dark return us to our proper senses but I can still taste your poems on my tongue as if they were alive as the August blackberries. And we can love the way love loves best—across an ocean or two.
Maureen 1/11/1992
And I hope that you heal your wounds—both physical and heart wounds. I feel that I have only just come out the other side, but then, I did a lot more time with John Oliver Simon. I'm not sure what half-life of the relationship I'm exorcising now or if it's an exponential thing.
I shall always think of you in the sauna’d summer of New York City. screaming obscenities at air conditioners at three AM. I fantasize about meeting you in front of St. Basil’s in Red Square in late August, when the white nights begin to wane, and the ordinary rhythm of light and dark return us to our proper senses but I can still taste your poems on my tongue as if they were alive as the August blackberries. And we can love the way love loves best—across an ocean or two.
Maureen 1/11/1992
B—
I’ve been back from Russia exactly one week and speaking of love affairs with hardly any people in them—today your ex-girlfriend, Barbara, called to ask if we had an affair while you were in SF last fall, and if I’m still having some sort of affair with you now. She said my contact with you (especially via letters or poems) is a continuation of said affair and probably connected to delusions on my part.
You wanna know how it makes me feel when she suggests I’m having a one-sided affair with you? Is that what you’ve been saying to her? That I’m chasing you across continents like some deranged French Leutenant’s Woman?
I’ve hardly even been in the USA the past five months and am far too busy teaching, writing grants and articles to be with friends—let alone, have a transcontinental affair with you. No matter that I've been living in the USSR with my Soviet lover all this time. I would like to know where this misinformation is coming from and why it continues to surface like scum long after the fact.
Why the long phone call from Barbara today? Why am I still in the middle of all this? I try to explain our meeting was a peripheral accident—a matter of some poems, etc., that there is nothing going on... how many times have I said this?
To wit, she tells me you show her my letters (tacky) as evidence. Betrayed trusts. She tells me she can’t sleep at night because the thought of my spreading possible rumors of her calling me and hanging up—disturbs her. Disturbed indeed. Spurned woman.
And now, I in turn, write to you, feeling unjustly accused of something I didn’t do, won’t do. Wouldn't do. I know the late night calls began when this whole mess started, and I deduced—perhaps unfairly—she was behind all this.
What if I accept Barbara’s statement she has only called me two times in her life and has never hung up without identifying herself? She’s called me more than twice—because I record such things in my journals—who said what, etc. I could pull out dates, etc., but what’s the point? Who’s the jury? Who’s the judge? Maybe the two events are unrelated. But we all keep feeding the cycle.
Maybe this whole thing is pointless—even writing to you now—not because I have future plans for you, as she suggested—but because I get pissed off when I feel I’m being used as a scapegoat. If I’m unjustly accused I go to the source (you) because otherwise it gnaws on me.
Ok, so maybe it isn’t fair to rip off at you because she says things to me. She’s a free agent, can say whatever she likes about me, believe whatever she wants, but it also involves you and me—I get so frustrated by all this. Maybe this is a plea to stop the insanity. It’s not productive.
Granted, I’m angry with you for inadvertently involving me in your domestic affairs and your decision to “end” to our “relationship” with “no further contact”—as if our contact were a threat to your relationship with her. I’d hoped your decision to sever all ties with me (such as they were, dangling participles aside), was so you could successfully patch things with Barbara which meant I’d no longer be involved in this absurd situation. Hallelujah!
She informed me that you cut off all correspondence with me because it was a matter of building trust—yours and hers. She made an ultimatum—either her or me. But I keep saying BUT WE’RE NOT HAVING AN AFFAIR! Why doesn’t anyone listen to me? Why do my words come back to haunt me distorted out of context, blown out of porportion? Used as weapons against me? Now even my answering machine message is suspect.
When she told me she thought we were still carrying on because my answering machine message says something cryptic about an electronic message and your poem to me mentions the word electricity—what should I have done? Laughed or screamed? At least she admitted to being paranoid then.
So I took your damned books to Russia, I reported back to you, and received an abrupt reply—no further contact. And felt betrayed. Though I don’t agree with your decision, I had no choice but to comply. No matter that I was walking around wounded for days wondering why. No matter that my respect for you diminished, that I thought you were spineless.
It wasn’t my decision to contact you a second time. Blame it on Vampire Myke, fate, etc. In fact, when he said to call you, I refused, because I was so angry I didn’t want to talk to you. I didn’t even want to bring those books to the USSR because it was a grim reminder. I did it because I believe in your work, not because I was harboring false hopes about you.
Imagine how I feel right now after schlepping those books half-way around the world. Pushkin said in matters of the heart, its better to be a sinner and enjoy it, than to be innocent and unjustly accused of sinning.
The problem is, in the very act of writing to you, this contact—in Barbara’s definition—means something is “going on.” Damned if I do and damed if I don’t. I guess it’s best you’re back in Brooklyn. I honestly don’t know what I’d do if I saw you at this point because I no longer quite know who or what to believe.
Maybe I’m old-fashioned, but my affaires DO have real people in them. Please, if you’re assuming I’m having one-sided affairs with you in the future, at least let me know in advance, OK? Then I can tell or not tell the person I’ve been involved with the past five months I’ve been unfaithful or not unfaithful or something like that. And we can add yet another layer of melodrama. Beware the waiting room.
Maybe you’re like Fowles’ central character Nicholas in The Magus who is a pawn in the godgame--a series of human illusions about something that does not exist. “The final truth... when the difference between fission and fusion lay in a nothing, a tiniest movement, betrayal, further misunderstanding... fragments of freedom, hazard, an anagram made flesh....”
2 Feb 1993